Facebook title:
Third Appeals Court Invalidates NLRB Appointments
<p>Last week, observers of labor policy were deeply ensconced in <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/senate-nuclear-option-94259.html">news</a> of the Senate deal to avert the so-called “nuclear option” on National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) nominees and other presidential appointees. However, there was additional news related to the NLRB that added a bit more fuel to the ongoing debate over the President’s purported recess appointments, which after all is how the whole political showdown started...</p>
Excerpt:
<p>By Sean P. Redmond 7/22/13</p><p>Last week, observers of labor policy were deeply ensconced in <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/senate-nuclear-option-94259.html">news</a> of the Senate deal to avert the so-called “nuclear option” on National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) nominees and other presidential appointees. However, there was additional news related to the NLRB that added a bit more fuel to the ongoing debate over the President’s purported recess appointments, which after all is how the whole political showdown started... </p>
By Sean P. Redmond 7/22/13
Last week, observers of labor policy were deeply ensconced in news of the Senate deal to avert the so-called “nuclear option” on National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) nominees and other presidential appointees. However, there was additional news related to the NLRB that added a bit more fuel to the ongoing debate over the President’s purported recess appointments, which after all is how the whole political showdown started.
